The Father of Communism, Karl Marx , said he had three
goals:
1.To dethrone God
2.To eliminate private property
3.To destroy the family
1.Targeting the family unit: Blonde
in the Belly of the Beast https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cpKE6I840FM
2.Siege: Cultural Marxists are
targeting the American Male
33:56 Brannon Howse, a Christian conservative, claims:
“If you destroy
the father as protector and provider of the family, the government steps in and
becomes the ‘daddy’.”
3.The following information focuses on the loss of the father in black American
families since the 1960’s.
In
the 1950’s, 80 percent of
black children were raised in 2 parent families
In
the 1960’s, a liberal President Johnson massively expanded welfare payments to
single moms. Having several children from different fathers generated a good
income. In 2015 it was estimated that a welfare mom received the equivalent of
65 thousand US dollars per year from the government. At that time, the median
income in the USA in 2016 was $57,617 .
The National Center for Health
Statistics said that in 2015, 77.3 percent of non-immigrant black births were
illegitimate. [Today, the single parent family is reality for almost 80% of
black children: exactly opposite the 1950’s before the government became ‘daddy’.]
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/77-black-births-to-single-moms-49-for-hispanic-immigrants
Homicide-victimization rates
for black men were 3.9 times the national average and 52 percent of all known
homicide victims were black (2017 data). He might have added that the
perpetrators of these crimes were overwhelmingly African Americans. In 2018,
where the homicide victim was black, the suspected killer also was 88 percent of the time. And this
is not an exceptional situation. From 1976 to 2005, 94 percent of black victims were killed by
other African Americans. https://www.nationalreview.com/magazine/2019/12/22/the-need-to-discuss-black-on-black-crime/
To drill down even further, in
2017, black males
accounted for 45 percent
of homicides, even though they make up just seven percent
of the population. That means they commit murders at a rate eight times higher
than whites. https://www.conservativereview.com/news/can-incarceration-rates-racist-reflect-actual-crime-rates/
Look up these terms: political correctness, cultural Marxism, the Frankfurt School
What is political correctness and where did it originate?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mrx6xU_bwxM
What is political correctness and where did it originate?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mrx6xU_bwxM
Do university authorities violate free speech rights?:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VjaKpjOttw
What are the limits to government authority?
https://youtu.be/87hP9cONk9M?t=705
Social Media platform "Medium" bans doctor's article balancing covid risks with economic risk
https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2020/04/the-limits-of-free-geach.php
Social Justice:
https://www.prageru.com/video/what-is-social-justice/
Do you think one or more of today's examples--colleges restricting free speech, governments ignoring constitutional rights, and social media platforms banning a doctor's argument about Covid are serious? Why, why not? Do you connect this to what Dr. Lind says about "political correctness"?
7 comments:
Josh Essay Topic
The worst racists question
1. I agree that government plays a role in family. With no father, the government steps in. Furthermore, I'm sure the government knows what it is doing to family. Welfare is attractive and it promotes single parents.
2. I think the media does it for two reasons. One, because of ignorance. Two, because they are covering up for the liberal government. Also, it is politically incorrect to appreciate white people, so they could never do that. Overall, it is deliberate and ignorance that play a factor.
3. I'm not too sure about this one. Socialism is on the rise but I don't think we're that close to it yet. I think it's really just to make men look bad right now. You never see deadbeat/abusive moms, only dads. So, to answer the question, I think it does support Marx's goal, but indirectly.
1. The above facts indicate a significant connection between government policies, family breakdown, and crime. Do you agree or disagree? Explain.
I think there is a connection between these, because if the government allows homosexual and gay weddings this creates family breakdown, and then the children or parents have emotional and mental problems, which can lead to drug overdoses and bad company. (Crime.) I think maybe the lack of government policies can have a connection to family breakdown and crime.
2. The mainstream media claim that poverty causes crime and that blacks suffer poverty because they are oppressed by white racism. Academia, Hollywood, and the Democrat Party blame white racism as the ultimate cause for every problem in the black community. Do you think they do this because of ignorance? Or is this deliberate?
I think they do this in ignorance, but also because they oppress the black community themselves. Without knowing it, Hollywood places the black men in the jails, and the black men doing the crimes in the alleys. This oppression comes from a stereotype Hollywood creates.
3. Is it coincidental that the popular media narrative about 'deadbeat dads', toxic males, and especially, white racism is supporting Karl Marx’s third goal?
I think that the media is trying to make their shows different or trying to accept all forms of a family, including deadbeat dads. They believe this form of liberalism will boost their business and make the regular family seem boring.
1. The above facts indicate a significant connection between government policies, family breakdown, and crime. Do you agree or disagree? Explain.
I agree that there are significant connections between government policies, family breakdown, and crime. If the government promotes families that are bound to breakdown, the people who believe them will participate in these families and they will break down. If the government promotes people looking out for themselves and working to get what they want, you get selfish people who do not care enough about anyone else to even think that that person they are stealing from could be worse off then themselves.
2. The mainstream media claim that poverty causes crime and that blacks suffer poverty because they are oppressed by white racism. Academia, Hollywood, and the Democrat Party blame white racism as the ultimate cause for every problem in the black community. Do you think they do this because of ignorance? Or is this deliberate?
I think they do this partially of ignorance of the fact that the black community is not suffering, but they also do this because they want to keep on the good side of the public. They say this to be on the good side of the public and yet because they do it they cause the public to promote it. It is a vicious circle. It is partially deliberate because I think that not everyone is ignorant and I think that those who aren't are doing it deliberately.
3. Is it coincidental that the popular media narrative about 'deadbeat dads', toxic males, and especially, white racism is supporting Karl Marx’s third goal?
I think that many in the government did this on purpose, how ever i would still like to think the best of several in the government and so i think that one or two higher officials brought this popular narrative into play and all others followed blindly or willingly, we may never know.
For the question due on Sunday:
I think the issue of social media banning what the doctor says is really serious because, just because he says something you don't like doesn't mean the doctor should be punished. He is speaking truth and we can see this about the doctor in wuhan, when he warned everyone the seriousness of the virus. It is believed that the government punished him for saying such things, because it meant the govt. was doing something wrong. Which they were. He eventually died of COVID-19 but many actually think the govt. ended his life. This can be linked to political correctness because if the public doesn't like something, they just ban it. But you can't hide from truth.
Question due Sunday:
I also think that the issue of social media banning is serious. If the doctor has something to say, they should say it, that is their right. The media should leave it up to the public to decide whether not to believe it or not. The media says it is not politically correct but now they are just throwing that phrase around just to help their case. The media may be doing this to keep the public calm, but they should be telling the truth, everyone is just freaking out the less they know.
I definitely think these moves are serious. The government is taking away basic rights from humans using COVID-19 as a cover-up. The fact that an educated doctor cannot speak at least what he deems to be true is a problem because now that really is not freedom of speech. To be honest, what Dr. Lind said about political correctness and freedom of speech go hand and hand. We can't say what is not politically correct, including ANYTHING that goes against the COVID-19 stats and claims of the government.
Post a Comment